While there were a whole number of changes to the ERA process I think for me these are the most significant:
- There will be a soft submission that can be checked by the ARC for potential errors before the submission is signed off by the Vice Chancellor - this will allow us an opportunity to fix the submission without requiring the VC to certify multiple times.
- Field of Research (FoR) codes will be apportioned rather than double and triple counted thus removing "ghost" unit of assessments.
- There will be exemplar Background Statements available.
- We will be able to see reports similar to the reports supplied to the Research Evaluation Committees (REC) which will give us a much better idea of what our submission looks like in the REC's eyes - this will also help in producing our Background Statements.
The rest of the presentation mainly talked about data quality issues which are always going to be issues that need sorting out. Also research theme codes are going to be added to every output - this seemed to be a big issue for most of the people in the room. I am not sure that this is such a big issue myself.
In all it was a great chance to hear about other research office's experiences with their submissions and a good chance to network.
Details of the forum and copies of the presentations can be found here: http://www.hes.edu.au/page/conferences---events/era-washup-forum/program---era-washup/